La Ciudad Espléndida

Observaciones urbanas para una sociedad más humana

Hacer buen urbanismo es rentable para todos

Publicado el 02 ene 2016 – 00:46h en el diario La Prensa, Ciudad de Panamá

Según las estadísticas oficiales, en 2015 la economía panameña perdió fuerza porque uno de sus motores, la industria de la construcción, mermó. No obstante, según el análisis alternativo de miembros de la Red Ciudadana Urbana, esta leve desaceleración es un ajuste ante la manera insostenible y anárquica con que se dio el boom inmobiliario. Para ellos, el estado de anarquía era tal que el cortoplacismo, la avaricia, la politiquería, el juega vivo y, ¿por qué no?, la vanidad de los últimos gobiernos, pudo más que el desarrollo urbano planificado y ordenado que hubiera rendido más y mejores frutos. Como urbanista, para mí este es un punto de vista que vale la pena considerar objetivamente.

De este caos han surgido ciudadanos conscientes que han tenido que enfrentar la anarquía reinante y dar a entender a la actual administración nacional y municipal que deberían intervenir. Es importante entender que, contrario a lo que dicen los medios y los poderes económicos, estos ciudadanos creen en el desarrollo económico pensado, ordenado y sostenible, y no están en contra del sector inmobiliario. Solo exigen que se cumplan las leyes y su espíritu, que se respete a la gente y se prefieran siempre las mejores prácticas urbanísticas, arquitectónicas y constructivas. Algo en que todos podemos estar de acuerdo. En pocas palabras, para estos ciudadanos si el sector inmobiliario y la industria de la construcción hubieran hecho las cosas bien desde el principio, estaríamos ahora mismo gozando no solo de crecimiento económico, sino de un alto nivel de desarrollo humano.

Si bien es cierto que un Estado excesivamente burocrático puede convertirse en ineficiente y corrupto, es necesario que el sector inmobiliario y de la construcción reconozca que no se pueden pasar por alto los derechos de las personas –cuya única defensa es la ley y las normas urbanísticas– so pretexto de la ineficiencia estatal y un falso desarrollismo. Es necesario que todos los panameños comprendamos que las leyes y normas urbanísticas y ambientales, con sus detalles técnicos, existen para garantizar un ambiente armonioso y de confort, además de la seguridad de todos, tanto en el presente como en el futuro, y no están para estorbar la libertad de empresa y el pleno goce y disfrute de la propiedad privada, ni violentar la seguridad jurídica de las inversiones, ni impedir, porque sí, el desarrollo inmobiliario.

Es un principio democrático básico que la libertad de empresa y la propiedad privada deben siempre responder y supeditarse al bien común y a la seguridad jurídica ciudadana, y bajo ninguna circunstancia puede someterse dicho bien común exclusivamente al beneficio económico de algunos grupos de poder financiero. Pues de nada vale tener crecimiento económico si no se traduce en mejor calidad de vida para todos.

Me parece entonces importante que en 2016 el sector inmobiliario reactive la economía haciendo las cosas bien, invitando a los pocos que dañan la imagen del sector a que dejen atrás los atajos y el “juegavivismo”. Sentémonos juntos en pie de igualdad y planifiquemos con ganas el futuro de nuestras urbes y así, mancomunadamente, podamos decidir y honrar nuevas reglas del juego que alineen a ciudadanos, empresas y gobierno con el fin de ofrecerle al país una mejor calidad de vida. Hagamos un frente común para que el Estado sea más eficiente en la aplicación de las normas, premiando y estimulando al que hace las cosas bien y castigando con firmeza a las personas naturales y jurídicas que violenten las normas. Este es el futuro que nos conviene a todos. Hagamos que 2016 sea realmente feliz, construyendo, juntos, la ciudad que queremos.

– See more at: http://impresa.prensa.com/opinion/Hacer-Carlos-Antonio-Solis-Tejada_0_4383311660.html#sthash.lcy03G2I.dpuf

Para preservar la memoria de la ciudad: Carlos Antonio Solís Tejada – La Prensa 21 de febrero de 2015

Muchos capitalinos sueñan con tener su propio espacio en medio de la ciudad y vivir a una distancia caminable de donde estudian, trabajan o se entretienen, con áreas públicas y vegetación bien diseñadas. Para algunos este espacio es una casa, para otros es un moderno apartamento, para mí sería un apartamento “viejo” en Bella Vista o La Exposición.

La elección de reutilizar una vivienda no solo debería considerarse respetuosa del medio ambiente, sino del patrimonio histórico arquitectónico y urbanístico de la ciudad de Panamá. Opción que debe estimular el Estado y acoger la empresa privada, como una oportunidad de negocio social y ambientalmente responsable.

Sin embargo, en la actualidad comprar “una casa usada” como las de Bella Vista, representa ser castigado con intereses bancarios a precio de mercado, porque la Ley 3 de 1985 y su modificación de 2012 le niega el interés preferencial a quien desee reutilizar un inmueble. Además, se debe pagar un impuesto de bienes inmuebles que no se le exige a los propietarios de una edificación nueva en el mismo sector, gracias al interés preferencial. Esto dificulta aún más la reutilización de esas casas.

Se trata pues de un sistema perverso que privilegia los nuevos y caros proyectos residenciales, que en realidad no funcionan como viviendas sino como plazos fijos en concreto, acero y vidrio, al alcance de poca gente adinerada (de Panamá o el extranjero) que compra esas propiedades para dejarlas vacantes y especular con su valor. Si muchas no cumplen con su función social, al no cobijar a nadie que las necesite por ser exorbitantemente caras, ¿por qué seguir financiándolas con nuestros impuestos? ¿Por qué no utilizar ese dinero para salvar el patrimonio arquitectónico, urbanístico y ambiental de la ciudad y ayudar a los capitalinos, de ingresos medios y bajos, a regresar al centro de la ciudad? La industria inmobiliaria puede ser parte del cambio, si actúa con responsabilidad social empresarial, y considera los aspectos ambientales, urbanísticos, éticos, estéticos y patrimoniales de sus inversiones.

El Estado podría extender los beneficios del interés preferencial a las inmobiliarias e individuos que adquieran y pongan en valor las casas con más de 40 años, además de dar estímulos fiscales a quienes certifiquen el interés patrimonial de un inmueble, por su historia y sus características arquitectónicas, como es el caso de las viviendas de Santa Ana, Calidonia/La Exposición, San Francisco y Bella Vista. También se les podría dar descuentos fiscales escalonados, ligados al grado de respeto y conservación patrimonial que demuestren al intervenir y poner en valor un inmueble viejo, por ejemplo, exonerándoles del pago del ITBMS en materiales de construcción para estas obras. Además, le podrían entregar el bono que destina el Mivi para viviendas de interés social a aquellos que deseen habitar un inmueble de 40 años o más.

Por último, mediante ley, el Estado pudiera darle un estímulo financiero a las promotoras de los proyectos de renovación, puesta en valor o reconversión. Además, darle utilidad social a las viviendas vacantes, al intervenir en el mercado para estimular u obligar el alquiler de todo inmueble que esté sin ocupar más de cinco meses, ya sea que su dueño la arrende al mejor postor, también mediante su venta o su expropiación, en caso de estar vacantes por más de un año. Esto daría mayor dinamismo y realismo al sector de alquiler privado en el centro de la ciudad

Con medidas pequeñas como estas, la empresa privada, el Estado y los ciudadanos podrían ayudar a prevenir la innecesaria expansión urbana, la invasión de terrenos, el desorden urbanístico y ayudar a densificar mejor la ciudad, respetando el medio ambiente, el patrimonio y el derecho a la ciudad de las personas. La conservación, reutilización y mantenimiento de residencias y edificios “viejos” es clave para ello.

¿Y usted qué piensa?

Original publicado en la sección de Opinión del diario La Prensa del 21 de febrero de 2015

I am Carlos… and I try to live by the Golden Rule.

I am not Charlie Hebdo… nor I´m Cherif nor Said Kouachi. I am Carlos and as much as I might regret the senseless deaths of the 12 innocent victims of terrorism, I regret as well the death of their perpetrators. As much as this might sound preposterous, I think every life is precious and nobody has the right to take it away. Also, the death of the Kouachi brothers was a missed opportunity for justice as their trial might have set an example to aspiring kamikaze/terrorists.

However, the main reason I am not Charlie Hebdo, nor the Kouachi brothers is that I live (or at least try to live) by the Golden Rule: Do to others, as you would have them do to you. It is that simple.

I can´t be either of them simply because I respect others regardless of their faith, politics or ideology as much as I would like them to do the same for me. I can´t be them either because I think my liberty is limited by other´s liberty and don´t hold my own form of liberty as supreme.

I don´t agree that being Charlie Hebdo is about defending our Freedom of Speech, because I think there is responsibility  to freedom and one freedom cannot trump over another freedom.  Freedom of Speech ought to be, limited by respect for the human person, by love for the other and for oneself.  I am not endorsing the Kouachi brothers either, because as much as I respect other people´s faith, God will never ask from us to defend him nor his messengers from silly cartoons. He is almighty He can perfectly do that for himself, right? Nor He will ask us to kill others in His name because since He is Love He has forbidden this in the first place (You shall not kill).

If both the magazine martyrs and the Kouachi brothers had lived by the Golden Rule, these senseless deaths would have never happened, because love and respect for the other would have ruled supreme over extreme interpretations of Freedom of Speech and Religious and Political Freedoms. Not mocking for mockery sake is not tantamount to self-censorship; it is both prudent and charitable. Does this mean that I think the 12 murdered cartoonists and journalists had it coming? Of course not! Making others pay with blood an offense done with ink is not only extremely unfair but also barbarous  and criminal and ought not to be tolerated.

However, saying you are like them is not only false, but also unhelpful as it overlooks the possible origins of this extreme and barbarous reaction: the constant expression of a bigoted view against religious/ethnic groups and the abuse of those things they hold most dear which adds to the social inequality they live every day, not only by a certain magazine but by mass media and society in general.  Isn´t this why some countries have forbidden hate speech or banned anything that might affect/offend minorities? Or…is it the case some minorities are more equal than others? Isn´t this kind of bullying environment that has radicalised some marginalised youth?

I would suggest thinking about this before saying you are someone who you might not be really like.

What do you think?

¿Voto por decencia?

Después de ver los resultados de estas elecciones muchos se han apresurado en decir que se ha roto el mito que los votos no se compran ni que una alta membresía garantiza una victoria, Antes de concluir que el pueblo panameño votó por la decencia y que el voto no se compra, permítanme dirigir sus miradas a la Asamblea Nacional (2014-2019).

Si vemos la composición de la Asamblea Nacional esta tiene una mayoría CD-PRD. Si consideramos que CD copio tal cual el modelo lamentablemente clientelista del PRD, podemos decir por tanto hay dos bloques clientelistas en la asamblea, esto es asumiendo de forma simplista que el panameñismo si bien juega al mismo juego no tenía a disposición el mismo caudal de recursos para repartir por tanto su voto fue menos clientelista. Por tanto esta es la asamblea mas clientelista electa recientemente. 

Como el viejo modelo de la era militar era una cadena donde en la base el Representante buscaba votos para el Diputado y el diputado para el Presidente y en 2014 los candidatos a la presidencia de los partidos mas clientelistas de 2014 no salieron electos. Esto quiere decir que para 2014 ni el CD ni el PRD tenían candidatos  a diputado y representantes completamente alineados con sus partidos, el CD por tener diputados con poca historia en el partido y que velan solo por sus intereses y el PRD porque evidentemente no ha sanado sus heridas internas del 2009 y por tanto los diputados y representantes que originalmente no eran navarristas se mantuvieron siendo anti-navarristas, por tanto no tuvieron incentivo alguno en gastar sus recursos promoviendo la figura de Juan Carlos Navarro. También hay que considerar que al cambiar las reglas del juego al eliminar el voto en plancha cada candidato a diputado veló prioritariamente por sus propios votos.  Ciertamente habrá un bloque de electores que habrá votado a conciencia pero para mí esta es la minoría.

En conclusión yo diría que en un 70% lo anteriormente expuesto explica la derrota de Juan Carlos Navarro. El otro 30% se explica por la imagen de un PRD demasiado ligado al régimen militar y sus figuras. Si el PRD desea ser potable en el futuro debe dejar dormir en paz al General Omar Torrijos y pasar a jubilación a toda la plana con vínculo alguno con el régimen militar. Si es posible deben hasta cambiar la bandera tricolor del 11 de octubre.

También fue un grave error pasear a viejas figuras del PRD que trajeron malos recuerdos a la población en especial a Ernesto Pérez Balladares, Balbina Herrera (por más que se haya reinventado muchos no olvidan su pasado dictatorial y lo sucedido con JCN). En mi opinión, el PRD debe reinventar su marca debe convertirse en un partido joven con una visión social ya sea inspirada en el humanismo cristiano o la social democracia.  

Si algo refleja la elección de los panameñistas, un partido liderado mayoritariamente por miembros de la más rancia elite social panameña y las mismas figuras de Navarro y Arias es que el panameño de a pie tiene cierta tendencia en mirar a esa elite para su liderazgo nacional más no para el liderazgo local como refleja la asamblea y los consejos municipales. Esto puede deberse a cierta aspiración o ver en esa clase algo “mejor” al que aspirar. Por tanto los cuadros que aspiren a la dirigencia nacional dentro del PRD y CD deben educarse mejor y pulirse de tal modo que pueda igualar o superar en imagen a la elite tradicional. Todo un reto para líderes que vengan “del subsuelo”. Venir de abajo no debe ser una excusa para la chabacanería, se puede ser pobre pero educado y refinado. 

En fin esto es lo que viene a mi mente…¿y usted que piensa?

Por Carlos Antonio Solis-Tejada

Panamá y su Diplomacia Kamikaze (La Estrella de Panamá, 14.03.2014)

Por Carlos Antonio Solís-Tejada

Como latinoamericano y ciudadano del mundo no tengo duda que la razón y la moral acompañan a Panamá al querer ayudar al pueblo venezolano de forma concreta ante la violación diaria que sufren de sus derechos y su dignidad como seres humanos. Sin embargo, tras el último chasco que se ha llevado Panamá ante la Organización de Estados Americanos (OEA) en días recientes, no puedo esconder mi preocupación por el rumbo un tanto suicida que ha tomado la diplomacia panameña durante la presente administración.

A mi parecer esta es la primera vez en el presente quinquenio en que Panamá, se pone del lado de la justicia a pesar de los desastrosos resultados de sus diligencias: 29 votos a favor 3 en contra de la benevolente e insípida resolución emitida por la OEA a favor de Venezuela y el rechazo a convocar una reunión de cancilleres o de enviar una misión mediadora.

¿Qué salió mal? Tal y como ha reportado el diario español, El País (08.03.14), obviamente la iniciativa panameña fue víctima de la aplanadora del ALBA + Caricom a lo que yo añadiría la UNASUR y la vergonzosa complicidad del resto de países latinoamericanos que no quieren ser, como Panamá víctimas gratuitas de la ira del Palacio de Miraflores.  ¿Bajo qué ilusión pensó nuestro canciller que en la OEA Venezuela no iba cuadrar a sus aliados dependientes de la generosidad dispensada por la diplomacia petrolera del chavismo o que no dudaría en torcer el brazo a los demás países que no quieren problemas con ellos? ¿Por qué no tomó en consideración las ambiciones brasileñas de liderazgo regional (Brasil prefirió convocar una reunión de cancilleres de UNASUR)? Hay que ser demasiado naif para pensar que otros países irían de frente contra el gobierno chavista o en detrimento de sus intereses particulares.

Por otro lado y sin demeritar la altura moral de la actuación de nuestro país, hay cierta verdad en decir que Panamá ha estado tomando activamente el lado de los EE.UU. y sus aliados, lo cual explica mas no justifica lo proferido por Maduro contra el Presidente Martinelli si se toma en cuenta  por ejemplo cuando Panama votó en coordinación con los EE.UU en contra de la admisión de la Autoridad Palestina como estado observador no miembro de la ONU ignorando el sentir de los cristianos, musulmanes y judíos que constituyen el pueblo Palestino que claman por el fin del régimen de apartheid sionista que cercena sus derechos humanos. Esto nos trae a la pregunta de si en el caso venezolano nuestro gobierno en realidad estaba haciéndole el “mandado” a los Estados Unidos o en verdad estaba actuando con sinceridad.

¿Acaso existirá algún sentido de la estrategia dentro de la diplomacia panameña? Por ejemplo, me pregunto porque antes de convocar la reunión de la OEA, el embajador Vallarino y el canciller Álvarez de Soto no se aseguraron de tener los apoyos necesarios para aprobar la iniciativa panameña. ¿O es que Panamá practica la diplomacia Kamikaze?  A juzgar por otros errores diplomáticos como el caso del apoyo de Martinelli a Japón en su disputa con China por las islas Diayou/Senkaku o el llamar al Estado de Israel “guardián” de Jerusalén y de los lugares santos el suicidio diplomático por emotividad parece ser la doctrina de este gobierno. Espero estar equivocado. Sin embargo a pesar de todo, hay que apoyar a nuestro gobierno pues Panamá tuvo la valentía de decir y hacer los que lo otros no se atrevieron por cobardía o mezquindad para ayudar a nuestros hermanos venezolanos. Ojalá Dios escriba sobre estas líneas torcidas y haga brillar su justicia en Venezuela.

¿Y usted qué piensa?

Panameñizar la ampliación: Carlos Antonio Solís Tejada

Panameñizar la ampliación: Carlos Antonio Solís Tejada

After the troubles created by European companies Sacyr and Impregilo it is high time for Panama to nationalise the project and complete it (hopefully) on time!

Mind the gap: What if Venezuelan ex-pats do go back home?

imagesHugo Chavez is dead and for many reasons, whether you are a “Chavista” or not, the importance of this event is not a minor issue. Although the real possibilities of a dismissal of Chavismo are a matter of debate it would be interesting to understand the impact of a change of regime would have in other countries.  More interesting in my view would be if Chavismo proves to be rather than a personality cult, a deeply rooted political culture and system that could either take years of transition to change into something different like in post Franco Spain (or post-communist Eastern Europe) or perhaps it could evolve and further develop into something more like post Mao China.

The outcome of events going on in Venezuela might be a matter of concern to its neighbours ….greater than they might imagine.  Very few seem to be making themselves the million dollar question…Could real estate markets plummet in Miami or in Panama City if middle class Venezuelans moved back home or stopped leaving Venezuela?

Of course such a question is highly speculative and for some even a non-question as the probabilities of a such a massive return (or a stop to the exodus) could be considered rather slim…but what if?  This is not a small question specially for places like Panama where the impact of Venezuelan immigrants has been greater than what their numbers might indicate  (24,000 in a country of 3 million inhabitants) and perhaps than in any other country. This community is unique in being composed mostly of people of professional or business backgrounds with high levels of educational attainment which contributes greatly to social and economic development wherever they settle.

The economic input of Venezuelans either settling or just securing their money in Panamanian banks or business ventures is such that they constitute the third source of Foreign Direct Investments in the country. It could also be safe to say that Panama’s real estate boom quickly recovered its pace after the shock of the financial crisis slowed down the influx of North American and European baby-boomers partially thanks to the influx of Venezuelan home buyers and investors some even buying entire new developments.

It would also be interesting to know the impact of a return of the 70,000 Venezuelans living in Miami where their presence can be felt in the city, a slight reminiscence to the impact Cuban immigrants had in Miami after the Castro’s hijacked the Cuban Revolution. This is more so considering their contribution to an economy affected by the US Financial Crisis.

But there is no reason to worry, a recent survey showed that more than 95% of Venezuelans resident in the Miami surveyed said they had no intention to return even with a change of regime. After all, many have uprooted themselves from Venezuela and rebuilt their lives in the US, perhaps the same could be assumed of those who moved to Panama or elsewhere. Many migrants were young couples whose children have grown up to be like any local kid in their host country. Many have established prosperous businesses and careers therefore the human drama of starting all over again is just too great to bear especially when there is nothing waiting for them in the short term. But the question will always remain…what if? I would greatly appreciate your opinions bash me, trash me if you want but please leave your comments below

Carlos Solis-Tejada, holds an MSc in Urbanisation & Development from the London School of Economics and Political Science and is currently based in London.

If the North were the South: Housing for a living.

Erica* is not your typical young lady: At age 22, she is quite remarkable in the sense that she already seems to know her potential and limitations and works hard within these. She came to London to do GCSE courses and improve her English in order to later get into the film industry as an editor.  So she needed to go to university and get a qualification.

Unlike most first year university students in the UK she didn’t have the benefit of a loan or a scholarship in order to pay for her education nor her living expenses so she needed some kind of economic arrangement…of the honest kind.   She certainly had to work and study but with a labour market offering precarious part-time minimum wage jobs (i.e pub, catering or babysitting jobs) she couldn’t afford accommodation at a reasonable distance from university so she became a live-in au pair for a family.

Being a nanny (or a manny) is becoming an increasingly popular option not only among university students such as Erica but also among graduates moving to London many of whom hold degrees and qualifications that will not help them find a job in their field of studies.   Job ads in expatriate websites offer a glimpse to the level of desperation many young adults have found themselves into in order to sustain themselves…more so if you are not local and without any friends or relatives  to help you for a while.

In this sense being a live in house worker could be a convenient arrangement for both employee and employer, if kept within the boundaries of legal working conditions. But as affordable accommodation is becoming increasingly inaccessible, informal forms of work and accommodation are becoming more common. Within the world of informal house work the line between being just a free live-in worker and a house serf can become very thin as the balance of bargaining power often tips towards employers who offer free accommodation and/or food. This might seem like a sweet deal considering that accommodation and food consumes most of an average low wage workers income but in case you quit you might find yourself in trouble first, trying to find a new job and then confronting accommodation costs.  If you are not careful enough, this might bind you to your employer for a long time while not fulfilling the goals that brought you to London.

In some cases employers might initially ask you to do child minding chores but as time goes by they might also ask for house cleaning chores unless as an employee you want to risk falling apart with your employer. So employees might find themselves in quite a dilemma as their private lives become quite restricted dependent on the host family’s schedule. But without much of a choice young people like Erica might have to sacrifice part of their youth in order to pursue their goals.

Everybody knows life isn’t easy but honestly as a Third World Observer. witnessing such a degree of informality and exploitation in rich, socially advanced countries is worrisome and makes me wonder whether the North is going South while the South is going North making Guatemalan pop singer Ricardo Arjona’s song “Si el Norte fuera el Sur” a reality or… are we getting to a meeting point?

Unless the labour market increases the number of quality jobs offered and the housing market offers more affordable decent housing, informality might prevail thus contributing to blur the distinction between the Global North and the South. Just a thought…

Carlos Solis-Tejada, holds an MSc in Urbanisation & Development from the London School of Economics and Political Science and is currently the Administrator of the My Home Project in London.

*Names have been changed in order to protect privacy

Bridging Generations

After being unemployed in Italy for almost a year Laura* recently decided to make a new beginning in London making use of her savings. She’s got a British university degree, speaks three languages, has a rich work experience and is a very bright and charming lady. What else could London’s job market ask for? Laura would find out soon.

Margaret* is an elderly woman now, four decades ago she came to the UK from a small island in the Caribbean and worked for many years in the judiciary system. During this time she purchased a property in west London where she has entertained family visits and friends; she never married nor had any children. Recently Margaret has been losing her mobility which has made it difficult for her to do many things. As difficult as it might seem for her to admit, she needs help.

Several months after our first contact, Laura arrived to London and since I couldn’t host her I helped her find accommodation with my friend Margaret whom I met as a student while lodging with her parish’s vicar two years ago. My landlord had a tenancy model based on an all-inclusive low weekly lodging fee which I later suggested Margaret to use. Under current housing regulations being a live-in landlord gives them full control of their property since the property is their home, thus making eviction easy in case of extreme necessity.

Of course this puts tenants in a very precarious situation, but unlike other housing arrangements weekly lodging gives them and their guests absolute flexibility and liberty. There is no need for a monthly rent in advance or a rent deposit, which currently are making private renting very expensive for young migrants such as Laura. It also gives lodgers the liberty to move out as soon as they find better accommodation elsewhere. Although optional, offering tenancy agreements with an address are good to help those looking to stay and need to open bank accounts or phone contracts. It is also understood that such a system requires a network of trusted referees who might provide a flow of good customers although this is not always an absolute guarantee as tenancy failure might happen. Luckily, Laura was referred to me by a friend of hers and I referred her to Margaret and as far as I know, it worked well.

Homeshare (which is an accommodation agreement similar to the one Laura and Margaret had) has great potential as a palliative to the housing issue for migrants and a source of practical help to the city’s ageing population. It bridges the home-owning generation with the so called “generation rent” which includes not only young migrants but also local youth to find decent accommodation for a low price (see link).

During her stay in London, Laura became a source of assistance to her landlady as she would make some time out of her job searching duties to help Margaret especially with groceries and moving some items around the house. They became very fond of each other but unfortunately Laura underestimated the time it would take for her to get a new fulfilling job in London and decided to head back home to continue her job applications while saving money as London is a very expensive city.

Certainly this kind of arrangement is not for everyone but as pensions increasingly do not make ends meet for many elderly citizens and access to the housing market has become almost impossible to the youth, in my mind, this is a way for these two generations to help each other. Perhaps this could somehow subvert the housing market bringing prices down on purpose since the aim is not at becoming rich out of this just to supplement or cover expenses. Of course this is just wishful thinking as it would require a critical mass of elderly homeowners that could make their spare rooms and couches available without expecting to make huge profits and for the young to become more charitable towards their elderly landowners.  But the possible generational exchange of experiences and skills could also bring in more benefits.

But clearly not every youngster has the time, patience and training to handle vulnerable elderly people and not every elderly person is in disposition to unsettle their set ways to accommodate to those of their guests. Possibly some training and counselling could help bridge the gap. In this sense local authorities in major cities should consider seriously this kind of arrangements within their strategies to tackle their housing deficit and homelessness problems especially among the young and single migrants. If they haven’t done so, they could build strategic alliances with charitable and social entrepreneurial organisations as an additional option in their menu of policy tools.

The My Home Project is overwhelmed with requests for accommodation and I have been referring these requests to people like Margaret through a Social Enterprise I have started recently with a friend of mine and the support of Il Ponte di Don Calabria called Bridging Generations. If you are interested in becoming part of this network by making your room or couch available or would like to give your economic or intellectual support please contact us! Just leave your details in the comments box. Also like my Facebook Page «The Third World Observer»

In the mean time I hope Laura can come back, London certainly needs people like her. As for Margaret my friend Franco * is moving in soon.

Carlos Solis-Tejada, holds an MSc in Urbanisation & Development from the London School of Economics and Political Science and is currently the Administrator of the My Home Project in London.

*Names have been changed in order to protect privacy

Non parlo inglese…but I know I can work

Michele* and Marcella* recently arrived to the hostel I manage in northern London. Michele would like to work as a home carer, Marcella as a nursery assistant. They are relatively young, seemingly healthy with some previous working experience but they don’t speak English to a basic level and didn’t finish their secondary education. That shouldn’t be a problem in London; after all, this city prides itself in being multicultural and full of opportunity…init?

 

Well, when Michele arrived I tried helping him respond to several job ads looking for home careers, in most cases, things seemed to go quite well until the language barrier was slammed at Michele’s face over and over again by every recruiter and employer. Thanks to her local contacts, Marcella had been lucky enough to get to some job interviews with every potential employer promising her a call back that never comes. Once back from her interview Marcella would usually recall being able to understand only half of what her interviewer would say and struggling to utter a half way intelligible answer. The language barrier strikes back.

 

How many Michele and Marcellas are arriving on a daily bases from crisis stricken European countries or the deindustrialised British north? With a high youth unemployment problem of its own, what can London do to prevent these young legal migrants to join the ranks of the frustrated, undereducated, unemployed and sometimes homeless that fuelled the summer 2011 riots? There seems to be no clear answers.

 

A sensible answer could come from grassroots initiatives. For example the hostel project I manage has been serving as a first point of contact to help EU migrants such as Michele and Marcella to find their way in London without falling into the trap of assistentialism. This is done by making them bear some responsibility by paying a symbolic below market price temporary lodging fee and making it clear they will be sharing accommodation with others and to think of an alternative plan before setting foot in London in case of not finding work and before running out of money to go back home. Lodgers help each other find work exchanging tips and contacts that could lead to a job. We also provide some guidance towards language courses for those needing them, but this is as much as we can practically do.

 

But much more needs to be done to provide services that could help reduce the negative impacts of non- integration of legal immigrants into the local communities by means of local support networks which could prevent them from geting into a worsening poverty spiral. In the meantime Michele has moved and found a part-time weekend job washing cars but he can barely make ends meet, probably he might end up sleeping in a park holding tight to his dream of a life changing experience in London or moving back to his picturesque alpine town. Marcella in the other hand is losing hope and returning to Italy would be heart breaking not just for her but to her parents. What can we do in order to prevent poverty among these young migrants? Creativity and compassion could help a bit.

 

Carlos Solis-Tejada, holds an MSc in Urbanisation & Development from the London School of Economics and Political Science and is currently the Administrator of the My Home Project in London.

 

*Names have been changed in order to protect privacy